Why the study?
Studies using 2D-STE have confirmed LV systolic dysfunction in diabetes mellitus, but whether 3D-STE is superior remains scarcely studied.
Does 3D-STE improve the evaluation of subclinical LV systolic dysfunction compared to 2D-STE in patients with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Does 3D-STE improve the evaluation of subclinical LV systolic dysfunction compared to 2D-STE in patients with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus?
3D-STE is a reliable imaging technique that demonstrates progressive impairment of LV myocardial mechanics from healthy individuals to prediabetic and diabetic patients with preserved LVEF.
May enhance subclinical LV dysfunction detection in DM; leaves open whether 3D-STE improves outcomes over 2D-STE.
Background: Several studies using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) have confirmed the presence of left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), but there is a paucity of studies on whether three-dimensional (3D)-STE is superior to 2D-STE. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical value of 3D-STE in assessing subclinical LV systolic dysfunction in prediabetic and diabetic patients with preserved LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and to investigate the independent risk factors for this medical disorder. Methods: This study included 40 diabetic patients, 35 prediabetic patients, and 33 healthy volunteers. All participants underwent LV peak systolic strain analysis using 3D- and 2D-STE, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed to determine the clinical diagnostic value of strain parameters for evaluating subclinical LV dysfunction in patients with prediabetes and type 2 DM (T2DM). Regression models were established to analyze independent risk factors for subclinical LV systolic dysfunction in patients with prediabetes and diabetes. Results: The results of the 3D-STE-based analysis showed that the global longitudinal strain (GLS) of the control, prediabetic, and diabetic groups were (18.64%±2.43%, 15.21%±1.49%, and 13.49%±2.36%, respectively), global circumferential strain (GCS) was (18.09%±2.37%, 14.62%±1.75%, and 12.95%±2.20%, respectively), global area strain (GAS) was (31.30%±3.88%, 27.51%±3.31%, and 24.80%±3.86%, respectively), and global radial strain (GRS) was (49.18%±5.91%, 39.17%±4.55%, and 35.72%±7.19%, respectively). All 3D-STE global strain parameters gradually decreased from the controls, through the prediabetic group to the diabetic group, and there was statistical significance between the three groups (P<0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) of the 3D-STE global strain parameters (GLS, GCS, GAS, and GRS) were 0.898, 0.831, 0.863, and 0.868, respectively. The AUC of the 2D-STE global strain parameters (GLS and GCS) were 0.867 and 0.636, respectively. Multivariate regression analysis identified increased glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and body mass index (BMI) as independent risk factors for subclinical LV systolic dysfunction. Conclusions: Prediabetic and diabetic patients with preserved LVEF are at risk of subclinical LV systolic dysfunction. 3D-STE is a reliable imaging technique for evaluating early damage to LV myocardial mechanics. Early control of blood glucose (Glu) levels and weight can effectively prevent heart failure in the prediabetic and diabetic populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: