Why the study?
Does thiazide diuretic monotherapy improve clinical outcomes and treatment persistence compared to ACEI, ARB, or CCB monotherapy in nondiabetic patients with hypertension?
Does thiazide diuretic monotherapy improve clinical outcomes and treatment persistence compared to ACEI, ARB, or CCB monotherapy in nondiabetic patients with hypertension?
In nondiabetic patients with hypertension, thiazide diuretics as first-line monotherapy are associated with a lower risk of major cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events compared to ACEIs, ARBs, or CCBs.
Supports thiazide diuretics as a preferred first-line option in nondiabetic hypertension; leaves open.
The authors compared the effectiveness of thiazide diuretic (TD), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), and calcium channel blocker (CCB) monotherapies for the treatment of nondiabetic hypertension using MarketScan Databases 2010-2014. Multivariable Cox regression models assessed whether the addition of a new antihypertensive drug, treatment discontinuation, or switch and major cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events varied across groups. A total of 565 009 patients started monotherapy with ACEIs (43.6%), CCBs (23.6%), TDs (18.8%), or ARBs (14.0%). Patients who took TDs had a higher risk for either drug addition or discontinuation than patients who took ACEIs (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69 [95% CI, 0.68-0.70] vs HR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.80-0.81]), ARBs (HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.66-0.68] vs HR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.65-0.67]), and CCBs (HR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.84-0.87] vs HR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.93-0.95]). Conversely, patients who took TDs experienced a lower risk of clinical events compared with patients who took ACEIs (HR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.15-1.33]), ARBs (HR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.18-1.39]), and CCBs (HR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.25-1.46]). Our results provide a strong rationale for choosing TDs as first-line monotherapy for the control of hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Machado et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: