Why the study?
Does a composite risk score based on preoperative physiological status reduce postoperative mortality in patients undergoing oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer?
Does a composite risk score based on preoperative physiological status reduce postoperative mortality in patients undergoing oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer?
A composite preoperative risk score incorporating cardiac, hepatic, and respiratory function significantly reduces postoperative mortality in patients undergoing oesophagectomy by improving patient selection.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support refined oesophagectomy selection; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Postoperative mortality after oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer depends largely on the preoperative physiological status of the patient. METHODS: A composite scoring system to predict the risk of oesophagectomy based on objective preoperative parameters was developed based on a retrospective review of patients operated on and evaluated prospectively in two subsequent patient groups. RESULTS: An initial retrospective multivariate analysis of 432 patients who had oesophagectomy identified a compromised general status (P < 0.001) and poor cardiac (P < 0.001), hepatic (P < 0.05) and respiratory (P < 0.05) function as independent predictors of a fatal postoperative course. Based on the relative risk associated with the individual impaired organ functions, a composite risk score was established. A prospective study in 121 patients confirmed that this composite scoring system provides a better identification of high-risk patients than any of the individual parameters. Inclusion of the composite score into the process of patient selection and choice of the procedure resulted in a decrease of postoperative mortality rate from 9.4 per cent (52 of 553) to 1.6 per cent (four of 252) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The risk of death after oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer can be assessed objectively before surgery and quantified by a composite risk score. This score provides a useful tool for refining the criteria of patient selection for resection or the choice of procedure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bartels et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: