Key result
Urine albumin and sodium predict HF outcomes, but experimental biomarkers fail to outperform serum creatinine.
Why the study?
To review the potential applications and pitfalls of urinary biomarkers in people with heart failure.
Urine albumin and sodium are useful for prognosis and guiding management in heart failure, but experimental biomarkers like NGAL and KIM-1 do not currently provide diagnostic superiority over serum creatinine for predicting worsening kidney function.
Urinary biomarkers may aid HF diuretic and therapy decisions; leaves open routine adoption pending confirmatory trials.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We review potential applications and pitfalls of urinary biomarkers in people with heart failure (HF). RECENT FINDINGS: Albuminuria may indicate kidney damage and guide prioritization of medications in HF. Urine sodium is useful in guiding diuretic management. Several experimental urine biomarkers have been evaluated, with the most robust data available for neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, kidney injury marker 1, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 in conjunction with tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2, angiotensinogen, and N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase. None provide diagnostic superiority over serum creatinine in evaluating risk of kidney injury. Some may have utility in identifying those at risk for adverse clinical outcomes. While urine albumin and sodium have prognostic and diagnostic utility in HF, the current role for other urine biomarkers is less clear, particularly in predicting worsening kidney function. Some of these biomarkers may provide mechanistic insights into kidney damage in HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roehm et al. (2026) conducted a review in Heart failure. Urinary biomarkers was evaluated. Urine albumin and sodium have prognostic and diagnostic utility in heart failure, while experimental urine biomarkers do not provide diagnostic superiority over serum creatinine for kidney injury.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: