Why the study?
Does the type of membrane oxygenator or flow type influence inflammation and coagulation markers during extracorporeal circulation in male patients?
Does the type of membrane oxygenator or flow type influence inflammation and coagulation markers during extracorporeal circulation in male patients?
Membrane oxygenators during CPB induce significant inflammatory and coagulation changes, with the CML 2 system showing the least distinct drop in clotting factors.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Membrane oxygenators during ECC link to clotting factor drops and inflammation irrespective of type or flow; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
The influence of four different membrane oxygenators (HF 4000, BOS-CM 50, CML 2, Maxima) on leucocyte count, concentrations of PMN-elastase, clotting factor XII, AT-III, C1-INH, alpha 2-antiplasmin and C3a was registered before, during and after CPB with pulsatile and nonpulsatile flow in 80 male patients aged between 36 and 67 years. With all systems tested, there was a drop in the concentrations of clotting factor XII, AT-III, C1-INH and alpha 2-antiplasmin in the early extracorporeal circulation (ECC) phase, exceeding the average hematocrit reduction accounted for by dilution. This drop was the least distinct with CML 2 systems, both with pulsatile and nonpulsatile perfusion, indicating system-inherent influences. Leucocyte cound and PMN-elastase concentration rose significantly during ECC irrespective of oxygenator tested of flow type applied. The rise in leucocyte count even continued for about 4 h after ECC. During the first 40 min of ECC, these changes were paralleled by a significant rise in C3a concentration, suggesting complement activation as a main cause for PMN activation. However, there is reason to suppose involvement of further mechanisms operating in PMN activation, since the elevated C3a-concentrations began to fall off while leucocyte count and PMN-elastase concentrations were still increasing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dapper et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: