Why the study?
Does elevated circulating BNP prevent Ang II-induced cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis in mice?
Does elevated circulating BNP prevent Ang II-induced cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis in mice?
Elevated circulating BNP protects against Ang II-induced cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis by inhibiting the ventricular ERK pathway.
May inform BNP-targeted strategies in hypertension; hypothesis-generating pending human validation.
Atrial and brain (B-type) natriuretic peptides (ANP and BNP, respectively) are known to exert various cardioprotective effects. For instance, knocking out the expression of ANP, BNP, or their receptor, guanylyl cyclase-A, induces cardiac hypertrophy and/or fibrosis. The cardiac effects of elevated circulating natriuretic peptides are less well understood, however. We therefore compared angiotensin (Ang) II-induced cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis in BNP-transgenic (Tg) mice, in which circulating BNP levels were elevated by increased secretion from the liver, and their non-Tg littermates. Left ventricular expression of Ang II type 1a receptor was similar in BNP-Tg and non-Tg mice, and there was no significant difference in the elevation of blood pressure elicited by chronic infusion or acute injection of Ang II. Nevertheless, cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis were significantly diminished in BNP-Tg mice chronically infused with Ang II. In addition, ventricular activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) induced by acute injection of Ang II was also diminished in BNP-Tg mice, as was activation of ERK kinase (MEK). Conversely, expression of mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase (MKP) was significantly increased in the ventricles of BNP-Tg mice. Based on these findings, we conclude that elevated circulating BNP exerts cardioprotective effects via inhibition of a ventricular ERK pathway. The mechanism responsible for this inhibition likely involves 1) increased ventricular MKP expression and 2) inhibition of transduction mediators situated upstream of ERK.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takahashi et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: