Key result
In children with acute myocarditis, treatment with intravenous immune globulin did not significantly improve the probability of survival at 1 year compared to conservative management (P=0.607).
Why the study?
Does intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) improve survival and recovery of ventricular function in children with acute myocarditis?
Cohort (n=33)
Yes
Does intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) improve survival and recovery of ventricular function in children with acute myocarditis?
Absolute Event Rate: 87% vs 80%
p-value: p=0.607
In children with acute myocarditis, IVIG therapy did not significantly improve survival or recovery of left ventricular function compared to conventional supportive care.
IVIG should not yet alter practice in pediatric acute myocarditis; leaves open need for RCTs on survival and ventricular recovery.
PURPOSE: There is currently little evidence to support intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) therapy for pediatric myocarditis. The purpose of our retrospective study was to assess the effects of IVIG therapy in patients with presumed myocarditis on survival and recovery of ventricular function and to determine the factors associated with its poor outcome. METHODS: We reviewed all consecutive cases of patients with myocarditis with left ventricular dysfunction verified by echocardiogram who had visited 3 university hospitals between January 2000 and September 2009. These patients were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 consisted of 23 patients (69.6%) who received IVIG alone or IVIG in combination with steroids, and group 2 consisted of 10 patients (30.3%) who received neither IVIG nor other immunosuppressive agents. Clinical manifestations, laboratory results, echocardiographic findings, and outcomes were compared between these 2 groups. RESULTS: One year after the initial presentation, the difference in the probability of survival did not show statistical significance in IVIG-treated patients (P=0.607). Of the echocardiographic parameters on admission, a shortening fraction of less than 15% was associated with unremitting cardiac failure. Furthermore, anemic patients were more likely to have elevated N-terminal fragment levels of the B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in the progressed group (P=0.036). CONCLUSION: There was no difference between the IVIG-treated patients and the control patients in the degree of recovery of left ventricular function and survival. Prospective, randomized, clinical studies are needed to elucidate the effects of IVIG treatment during the acute stage of myocarditis on ultimate outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2010) conducted a cohort in Acute myocarditis (n=33). Intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) vs. No IVIG or other immunosuppressive agents was evaluated on Survival at 1 year after presentation (p=0.607). In children with acute myocarditis, treatment with intravenous immune globulin did not significantly improve the probability of survival at 1 year compared to conservative management (P=0.607).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: