Key result
Blood flow restriction resistance training will be evaluated for its effects on muscle strength, muscle mass, and functional performance in a planned randomized controlled trial of 30 patients with liver cirrhosis.
Why the study?
Patients with hepatic cirrhosis experience reduced muscle mass, function, and quality of life, but the effects of resistance training with blood flow restriction in this population remain unknown.
Does resistance training with blood flow restriction improve muscle strength and mass in patients with liver cirrhosis?
RCT (n=30)
Maximally tolerated imbalance model
No
Does resistance training with blood flow restriction improve muscle strength and mass in patients with liver cirrhosis?
This study protocol outlines a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of blood flow restriction resistance training on muscle mass and function in patients with liver cirrhosis.
May guide rehab for sarcopenia in cirrhosis if positive; extends BFR evidence to a new high-risk population.
BACKGROUND: Patients affected by hepatic cirrhosis show reductions in muscle mass and function, with poor quality of life and functional performance. As such, resistance training with blood flow restriction (BFR-RT) could be a useful therapeutic tool for health promotion. Thus, we aim to verify the effects of this intervention on muscle strength, muscle mass, fiber Pennation angle, fascicle length, functional performance, quality of life, and fall risk scores in this population. METHODS: Thirty participants will be randomly distributed between 1) BFR-RT and 2) control (CTRL). Assessments will occur at three time points: before the training intervention (0 W), after 12 weeks (12 W), and at follow-up (24 W). The following variables will be assessed: Child-Pugh classification; MELD score; SF-36 questionnaire; fatigue severity index; 6-min walk test; timed-up and go; 30-s sitting and rising test; dietary record; one-repetition maximum (1-RM) strength test (knee extension exercise); and vastus lateralis' cross-sectional area, Pennation angle, and fascicle length. The BFR-RT group will undergo 12 weeks of knee extension exercise (1 × 30 repetitions and 3 × 15 repetitions at 20% 1-RM and 50% of total blood flow occlusion pressure), with two sessions per week. Data normality will be assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. In case of normal distribution, a one-way repeated measures analysis of variance will be implemented to test for differences in baseline values. A mixed model then will be applied for each dependent variable. In case of non-normal data distribution, a Kruskal-Wallis test will be implemented to test for differences in baseline values. Next, the Friedman test will be used to analyze repeated measures. Within- and between-group effect sizes will be calculated using Cohen's d for each outcome. Finally, the minimal clinically important difference will be analyzed with distribution-based methods. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this will be the first trial to investigate BFR-RT in patients with cirrhosis and evaluate the effects on neuromuscular parameters, functional performance, disease severity, and quality of life outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (ReBec): RBR-395mfw. Registered on 25 August 2018.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nóbrega et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Liver cirrhosis (n=30). Resistance training with blood-flow restriction (BFR-RT) vs. Sham intervention (30-min sessions of cephalocaudal muscle relaxation and breathing exercises) was evaluated on Knee extensor strength (1-RM), vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area, fiber Pennation angle, fascicle length, functional performance, and risk of falls. Blood flow restriction resistance training will be evaluated for its effects on muscle strength, muscle mass, and functional performance in a planned randomized controlled trial of 30 patients with liver cirrhosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: