Key result
Use of prasugrel or ticagrelor was not associated with significantly lower 30-day mortality compared with clopidogrel in patients undergoing saphenous vein graft PCI for acute coronary syndrome.
Why the study?
Does the use of potent P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel or ticagrelor) improve clinical outcomes compared to clopidogrel in patients undergoing saphenous vein graft PCI for acute coronary syndrome?
Observational (n=8,119)
Yes
Does the use of potent P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel or ticagrelor) improve clinical outcomes compared to clopidogrel in patients undergoing saphenous vein graft PCI for acute coronary syndrome?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In a real-world national database, the use of potent P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel or ticagrelor) for saphenous vein graft PCI in acute coronary syndrome was not associated with improved ischemic outcomes or mortality compared to clopidogrel.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate outcomes associated with different P2Y12 agents in Saphenous Vein graft (SVG) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: SVG PCI is associated with greater risks of ischemic complications, compared with native coronary PCI. Outcomes associated with the use of potent P2Y12 blocking drugs, Prasugrel and Ticagrelor, in SVG PCI are unknown. METHODS: Patients included in the study underwent SVG PCI in the United Kingdom between 2007 and 2014 for acute coronary syndrome and were grouped by P2Y12 antiplatelet use. In-hospital major adverse cardiac events, major bleeding and 30-day and 1-year mortality were examined. Multiple imputations with chained equations to impute missing data were used. Adjustment for baseline imbalances was performed using (1) multiple logistic regression (MLR) and (separately) (2) propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: Data weres analyzed from 8,119 patients and most cases were treated with Clopidogrel (n = 7,401), followed by Ticagrelor (n = 497) and Prasugrel (n = 221). In both MLR and PSM models, there was no significant evidence to suggest that either Prasugrel or Ticagrelor was associated with significantly lower 30-day mortality compared with Clopidogrel. The odds ratios reported from the multivariable analysis were 1.22 (95% CI: 0.60-2.51) for Prasugrel vs. Clopidogrel and 0.48 (95% CI: 0.20-1.16) for Ticagrelor vs. Clopidogrel. No significant differences were seen for in-hospital ischemic or bleeding events. CONCLUSIONS: Our real world national study provides no clear evidence to indicate that use of potent P2Y12 blockers in SVG PCI is associated with improved clinical outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sirker et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Acute coronary syndrome (n=8,119). Prasugrel or Ticagrelor vs. Clopidogrel was evaluated on 30-day mortality (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.60-2.51). Use of prasugrel or ticagrelor was not associated with significantly lower 30-day mortality compared with clopidogrel in patients undergoing saphenous vein graft PCI for acute coronary syndrome.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: