Key result
Fractal scaling exponents of heart period variability were not reproducible within individuals and failed to reliably distinguish between control and autonomic blockade conditions.
Why the study?
Does combined autonomic blockade affect the fractal scaling exponent of heart period variability in young, healthy individuals?
Does combined autonomic blockade affect the fractal scaling exponent of heart period variability in young, healthy individuals?
Fractal scaling exponents of heart period variability lack within-individual reproducibility and do not reliably reflect autonomic control mechanisms.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Fractal scaling exponents should not guide clinical autonomic assessment; leaves open their validity as research biomarkers of heart period variability.
Fractal frequency scaling of heart period variability is used as a concise index of overall cardiac control. However, no prior study has assessed within-individual reproducibility of fractal indices of heart period, or reported how the estimated indices respond to autonomic blockade. Therefore, we examined fractal properties of the heart period from ten young, healthy individuals during three separate experimental sessions under control (saline) conditions and twice under combined autonomic blockade (atenolol and atropine sulfate) conditions. Under each condition, R-R intervals were recorded with the subject in the supine and the 40 deg upright tilt positions during 20 min of controlled breathing in each position. We calculated the fractal scaling exponent using detrended fluctuation analysis and estimated confidence intervals of the scaling exponents for each R-R interval time series within each individual. In the control condition, upright tilt significantly increased the scaling exponents (from 0.73 +/- 0.11 (+/-S.D., session 1), 0.72 +/- 0.10 (session 2) and 0.75 +/- 0.13 (session 3) to 0.82 +/- 0.12, 0.82 +/- 0.11 and 0.84 +/- 0.10; Student's paired t-test, t = 2.79, P = 0.02; t = 2.80, P = 0.02; and t = 2.07, P = 0.07). However, neither the absolute scaling exponents nor their change in response to upright tilt were reproducible (Lin's concordance coefficient less than 0.9, P > 0.1 for all comparisons). Following autonomic blockade, the scaling exponents were significantly increased (supine: 1.08 +/- 0.13 and 1.08 +/- 0.14; tilt: 1.07 +/- 0.21 and 1.08 +/- 0.14) for both experimental sessions (two-way repeated-measures ANOVA; F(17,1) = 40.89, P < 0.001 and F(17,1) = 42.72, P < 0.001) regardless of position. However, within individuals, the scaling exponents failed to distinguish between control and blockade for half of the subjects in at least one experimental session. Thus, fractal scaling exponents are not reproducible within individuals and do not reliably reflect the autonomic mechanisms responsible for heart period variability. In fact, data from combined blockade suggest that physiological effects of autonomic outflow may mask intrinsic fractal behaviour of the sinoatrial node.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tan et al. (2009) studied Healthy (n=10). Combined autonomic blockade (atenolol and atropine sulfate) vs. Control (saline) was evaluated on Fractal scaling exponent using detrended fluctuation analysis (p=<0.001). Fractal scaling exponents of heart period variability were not reproducible within individuals and failed to reliably distinguish between control and autonomic blockade conditions.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: