Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We compared the rates of detection of respiratory viruses by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and by conventional viral culture in 668 combined nasal and throat samples from a prospective, multicenter, population-based study of acute respiratory tract infections among hospitalized children aged <5 years. RT-PCR increased the yield of viral identification by 2-fold, compared with that of culture alone. The increased sensitivity of viral detection by RT-PCR will yield better estimates of the population burden of viral respiratory infections.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weinberg et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: