Key result
Having four cardiovascular risk factors was associated with a significantly higher common carotid intima-media thickness compared to having no risk factors (mean difference 0.114 mm).
Why the study?
Does the clustering of cardiovascular risk factors increase common carotid intima-media thickness in the general population?
Cross-Sectional (n=59,025)
Yes
Does the clustering of cardiovascular risk factors increase common carotid intima-media thickness in the general population?
Mean Difference: 0.114 (95% CI 0.103–0.124)
Clusters of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors are associated with increased common carotid intima-media thickness in a graded, synergistic manner across sexes and race-ethnic groups.
Supports aggressive, early modification of clustered risk factors to prevent subclinical atherosclerosis; leaves open whether this.
BACKGROUND: The relation of a single risk factor with atherosclerosis is established. Clinically we know of risk factor clustering within individuals. Yet, studies into the magnitude of the relation of risk factor clusters with atherosclerosis are limited. Here, we assessed that relation. METHODS: Individual participant data from 14 cohorts, involving 59,025 individuals were used in this cross-sectional analysis. We made 15 clusters of four risk factors (current smoking, overweight, elevated blood pressure, elevated total cholesterol). Multilevel age and sex adjusted linear regression models were applied to estimate mean differences in common carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) between clusters using those without any of the four risk factors as reference group. RESULTS: Compared to the reference, those with 1, 2, 3 or 4 risk factors had a significantly higher common CIMT: mean difference of 0.026 mm, 0.052 mm, 0.074 mm and 0.114 mm, respectively. These findings were the same in men and in women, and across ethnic groups. Within each risk factor cluster (1, 2, 3 risk factors), groups with elevated blood pressure had the largest CIMT and those with elevated cholesterol the lowest CIMT, a pattern similar for men and women. CONCLUSION: Clusters of risk factors relate to increased common CIMT in a graded manner, similar in men, women and across race-ethnic groups. Some clusters seemed more atherogenic than others. Our findings support the notion that cardiovascular prevention should focus on sets of risk factors rather than individual levels alone, but may prioritize within clusters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular risk factors and atherosclerosis (n=59,025). Clusters of cardiovascular risk factors (1 to 4 factors) vs. No cardiovascular risk factors was evaluated on Mean difference in common carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) (MD 0.114 mm, 95% CI 0.103, 0.124). Having four cardiovascular risk factors was associated with a significantly higher common carotid intima-media thickness compared to having no risk factors (mean difference 0.114 mm).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: