Why the study?
This study investigated the association between Type D personality and prognoses in stable coronary artery disease patients by mode of endpoints, age, and methodological debates to explain substantial heterogeneity among Type D studies.
Does Type D personality increase the risk of MACEs in patients with stable coronary artery disease?
Does Type D personality increase the risk of MACEs in patients with stable coronary artery disease?
Type D personality is an independent prognostic factor for major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with stable coronary artery disease, particularly among younger patients and those with comorbidities.
May identify higher-risk stable CAD patients; hypothesis-generating for interventions pending validation in larger cohorts.
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the association between Type D personality and prognoses in stable coronary artery disease (CAD) patients by mode of endpoints, age, and methodological debates to explain substantial heterogeneity among Type D studies. DESIGN: The prospective study was designed to recruit 590 stable CAD patients in Taiwan. Main outcome measures: Demographic and clinical characteristics, and the 14-item Type D scale-Taiwanese version were recorded at discharge. RESULTS: Hierarchical logistic regression analyses showed, regardless of the methodological debates, Type D personality was significantly associated with MACEs though not non-cardiac outcomes in stable CAD patients after adjusting for possible confounders. Furthermore, Type D personality was especially associated with MACEs in stable CAD patients with younger age (<65 y), rather than older age (≥65 y). Subgroup analysis also showed the adverse effect of Type D personality on MACEs was larger among males, those living in the rural region, those with PTCA or stent, those with heart failure, hypertension, diabetes, and those who were smokers. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of whether the methodological debate is dichotomous or continuous, Type D personality was significantly associated with MACEs in stable CAD patients, some of whom had younger age, were males, smokers, or had comorbidities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: