Why the study?
The relationship between stress transthoracic Doppler echocardiography-derived coronary flow velocity reserve and thermodilution-derived coronary flow reserve before and after elective PCI remained unclear.
Does stress TDE-derived coronary flow velocity reserve correlate with thermodilution-derived coronary flow reserve before and after elective PCI in patients with LAD lesions?
Does stress TDE-derived coronary flow velocity reserve correlate with thermodilution-derived coronary flow reserve before and after elective PCI in patients with LAD lesions?
Noninvasive TDE-derived and invasive thermodilution-derived coronary flow reserves are not interchangeable, particularly after PCI, as they likely represent different coronary physiologies.
CFR metrics from TDE and thermodilution are not interchangeable post-PCI; leaves open their comparative utility for guiding revascularization.
Background: Coronary flow reserve (CFR) provides prognostication and coronary physiological information, including epicardial coronary stenosis and microvascular function. The relationship between stress transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TDE)-derived coronary flow velocity reserve (CFRS-TDE) and thermodilution-derived coronary flow reserve (CFRthermo) before and after elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains unclear. Methods: This single-center prospective registry study evaluated patients who underwent fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided elective PCI for left anterior descending artery (LAD) lesions with wire-based invasive physiological measurements and pre- and post-PCI stress TDE examinations. Results: A total of 174 LAD lesions from 174 patients were included in the final analysis. A modest correlation was detected between the pre-PCI CFRS-TDE and the pre-PCI CFRthermo (r=0.383, P<0.001). The frequently used CFRS-TDE threshold of 2.0 corresponded to a pre-PCI CFRthermo of 2.18. Pre-PCI CFRS-TDE underestimated pre-PCI CFRthermo [1.89 (1.44–2.31) vs. 2.05 (1.38–2.93), P<0.001]. Both CFRS-TDE and CFRthermo increased significantly post-PCI [pre-PCI CFRS-TDE 1.89 vs. post-PCI CFRS-TDE 2.33, P<0.001; pre-PCI CFRthermo 2.05 (1.38–2.93) vs. post-PCI CFRthermo 2.59 (1.63–3.55), P<0.001]. In contrast, there was no significant relationship between changes in CFRS-TDE and changes in CFRthermo after PCI (r=0.008, P=0.915) or between post-PCI CFRS-TDE and post-PCI CFRthermo (r=0.054, P=0.482). Conclusions: Pre-PCI CFRS-TDE and CFRthermo are modestly correlated, but post-PCI CFRS-TDE and CFRthermo have no correlation. CFRS-TDE and CFRthermo are not interchangeable, particularly post-PCI, suggesting that the two metrics represent different coronary physiologies after PCI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matsuda et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: