Why the study?
Is moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea associated with increased disease severity and worse long-term prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Is moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea associated with increased disease severity and worse long-term prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea is associated with increased disease severity and a higher risk of long-term major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome.
May inform risk stratification in ACS; hypothesis-generating for OSA intervention trials.
BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common disease in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and associated with an increased risk of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events. However, most patients in previous study were treated with bare metal stents and the sample sizes were relatively low. The goal of this study was to evaluate the influence of OSA on the severity and prognosis of patients admitted for ACS. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, we enrolled patients with ACS who were hospitalized for coronary angiogram/percutaneous coronary intervention and undergone polysomnography. We divided the patients into two groups: moderate to severe OSA group [apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) > 15 events/h] and control group (AHI ≤ 15 events/h). They were followed up for up 32 months. Then, we compared the ACS severity and long-term major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with different severity of OSA. RESULTS: = 0.047, HR = 1.618, 95% CI: 1.069-3.869). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that moderate or severe OSA is correlated with disease severity and associated with worse long-term prognosis in ACS patients. The results raising the possibility that early diagnose and interventions of OSA could improve long-term outcomes in ACS patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jia et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: