Why the study?
Systolic interarm differences in blood pressure have been associated with all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease, but individual participant data meta-analyses were needed to quantify independent associations, develop prognostic models, and test associations after adjusting for cardiovascular risk scores.
Is a systolic interarm difference in blood pressure associated with increased mortality and cardiovascular events?
Is a systolic interarm difference in blood pressure associated with increased mortality and cardiovascular events?
A systolic interarm blood pressure difference is independently associated with increased all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and cardiovascular events, supporting bilateral BP measurement and a 10 mm Hg upper limit of normal.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Interarm systolic BP difference independently predicts mortality and events; confirms associations yet leaves open incremental value over standard scores.
Systolic interarm differences in blood pressure have been associated with all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease. We undertook individual participant data meta-analyses to (1) quantify independent associations of systolic interarm difference with mortality and cardiovascular events; (2) develop and validate prognostic models incorporating interarm difference, and (3) determine whether interarm difference remains associated with risk after adjustment for common cardiovascular risk scores. We searched for studies recording bilateral blood pressure and outcomes, established agreements with collaborating authors, and created a single international dataset: the Inter-arm Blood Pressure Difference - Individual Participant Data (INTERPRESS-IPD) Collaboration. Data were merged from 24 studies (53 827 participants). Systolic interarm difference was associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: continuous hazard ratios 1.05 (95% CI, 1.02-1.08) and 1.06 (95% CI, 1.02-1.11), respectively, per 5 mm Hg systolic interarm difference. Hazard ratios for all-cause mortality increased with interarm difference magnitude from a ≥5 mm Hg threshold (hazard ratio, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.01-1.14]). Systolic interarm differences per 5 mm Hg were associated with cardiovascular events in people without preexisting disease, after adjustment for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (hazard ratio, 1.04 [95% CI, 1.00-1.08]), Framingham (hazard ratio, 1.04 [95% CI, 1.01-1.08]), or QRISK cardiovascular disease risk algorithm version 2 (QRISK2) (hazard ratio, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.06-1.18]) cardiovascular risk scores. Our findings confirm that systolic interarm difference is associated with increased all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and cardiovascular events. Blood pressure should be measured in both arms during cardiovascular assessment. A systolic interarm difference of 10 mm Hg is proposed as the upper limit of normal. Registration: URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42015031227.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clark et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: