Why the study?
Catheter ablation for AF causes dynamic myocardial changes and early biomarker alterations, but mid-term changes in biomarkers and their ability to predict AF recurrence at one year required examination.
Do mid-term changes in biomarker profiles following catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation predict AF recurrence at 1 year?
Do mid-term changes in biomarker profiles following catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation predict AF recurrence at 1 year?
While catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation induces significant mid-term changes in various biomarkers, these changes do not predict clinical AF recurrence at 1 year.
May support mid-term biomarker monitoring to flag AF recurrence risk; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Following catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), there are dynamic changes in the atrial myocardium associated with damage to and necrosis of atrial tissue and other procedure related changes in rhythm and anticoagulation. Early time-dependent changes in biomarkers of necrosis, inflammation, and coagulation have been reported. This study examines mid-term (4-8 weeks post-ablation) changes in biomarkers and explores their ability to predict AF recurrence at one-year. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients (mean age 65.4 ± 9.7 years, 30% female) undergoing catheter ablation for AF had peripheral venous blood samples obtained at the time of ablation and 4-8 weeks later. All samples were processed to obtain plasma which was frozen for subsequent analysis. Coagulation studies were performed at the Northwestern Special Hemostasis Laboratory: VWF, ADAMTS13, PAI-1, D-dimer, and TAT complexes. A commercial lab analyzed samples for CRP, cystatin C, fibrinogen, galectin, IL-6, MMP-2, myoglobin, NT-proBNP, PAI-1, TIMP-1, TIMP-2, TPA, and VWF. RESULTS: Significant changes were noted with higher levels of ADAMTS13 (p < 0.0001), fibrinogen (p = 0.004), MMP-2 (p = 0.0002), TIMP-2 (p = 0.003), and TPA (p = 0.001) compared to lower levels of TAT (p < 0.0001) and NT-proBNP (p = 0.0001) at follow up post-ablation. One year after ablation, AF had recurred in 11/26 (42%) of patients. None of the biomarker changes predicted the 1-year outcome, and there was no significant association with the use of warfarin versus rivaroxaban. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing catheter ablation for AF, there were significant changes in pre- vs post-ablation levels of multiple biomarkers. However, these changes were not associated with 1-year outcome of AF recurrence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goldberger et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: