Why the study?
Do eNOS gene polymorphisms influence target organ damage in hypertensive subjects?
Do eNOS gene polymorphisms influence target organ damage in hypertensive subjects?
This study found no independent association between eNOS gene polymorphisms and cardiovascular target organ damage in hypertensive subjects, suggesting age is a more significant predictor.
No support for eNOS genotyping to stratify hypertensive cardiovascular risk; leaves open validation of null findings in larger prospective cohorts.
BACKGROUND: Nitric oxide (NO) synthesized by endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) plays an important role in regulation of endothelial function and in the control of blood pressure. However, the results from some studies on the association between three clinically relevant eNOS gene polymorphisms (G894T, T786C and intron 4b/a) and essential hypertension are unclear. We designed a case-control study to evaluate the influence of eNOS polymorphisms on target organ damage in 127 hypertensives and 67 normotensives. Clinical evaluation, biochemical parameters, Urinary Albumin Excretion (UAE) and echocardiogram were performed to characterize target organ damage. eNOS polymorphism were recognized by PCR method. RESULTS: The distribution of eNOS genotypes was similar in hypertensives and normotensives but 4aa was present in the 2.5% of hypertensives and completely absent in normotensives. Subjects with 4bb, G894T, and T786C genotypes showed an increased prevalence of target organ damage. Moreover prevalence of G894T and introne 4 variants was significantly higher in hypertensives than in normotensives both with cardiovascular damage. Logistic regression analysis didn't show any association between eNOS polymorphisms, Body Mass Index (BMI), hypertension, gender and cardiovascular damage. Only the age (OR 1.11; IC 95% 1.06-1.18) was predictive of cardiovascular damage in our population. CONCLUSION: Our results seem to indicate a lack of association with eNOS variants and cardiovascular damage onset.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Colomba et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: