Why the study?
Is the cardiothoracic ratio a stable and reproducible screening tool for cardiomegaly in HIV-1 infected adults?
Is the cardiothoracic ratio a stable and reproducible screening tool for cardiomegaly in HIV-1 infected adults?
Cardiothoracic ratio on chest radiograph is a stable and reproducible measurement that may serve as a screening tool for cardiovascular disorders in HIV-1 infected patients in resource-limited settings.
CTR may aid cardiomegaly screening in HIV; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disorders are common in HIV-1 infected persons in Africa and presentation is often insidious. Development of screening algorithms for cardiovascular disorders appropriate to a resource-constrained setting could facilitate timely referral. Cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) on chest radiograph (CXR) has been suggested as a potential screening tool but little is known about its reproducibility and stability. Our primary aim was to evaluate the stability and the inter-observer variability of CTR in HIV-1 infected outpatients. We further evaluated the prevalence of cardiomegaly (CTR≥0.5) and its relationship with other risk factors in this population. METHODOLOGY: HIV-1 infected participants were identified during screening for a tuberculosis vaccine trial in Khayelitsha, South Africa between August 2011 and April 2012. Participants had a digital posterior-anterior CXR performed as well as history, examination and baseline observations. CXRs were viewed using OsiriX software and CTR calculated using digital callipers. RESULTS: 450 HIV-1-infected adults were evaluated, median age 34 years (IQR 30-40) with a CD4 count 566/mm3 (IQR 443-724), 70% on antiretroviral therapy (ART). The prevalence of cardiomegaly was 12.7% (95% C.I. 9.6%-15.8%). CTR was calculated by a 2nd reader for 113 participants, measurements were highly correlated r = 0.95 (95% C.I. 0.93-0.97) and agreement of cardiomegaly substantial κ = 0.78 (95% C.I 0.61-0.95). CXR were repeated in 51 participants at 4-12 weeks, CTR measurements between the 2 time points were highly correlated r = 0.77 (95% C.I 0.68-0.88) and agreement of cardiomegaly excellent κ = 0.92 (95% C.I. 0.77-1). Participants with cardiomegaly had a higher median BMI (31.3; IQR 27.4-37.4) versus 26.9; IQR 23.2-32.4); p<0.0001) and median systolic blood pressure (130; IQR 121-141 versus 125; IQR 117-135; p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: CTR is a robust measurement, stable over time with substantial inter-observer agreement. A prospective study evaluating utility of CXR to identify cardiovascular disorder in this population is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Esmail et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: