Key result
Preeclampsia is linked to ~4 mL higher mean LVEDV compared with normotensive pregnancy.
Why the study?
The hemodynamics of preeclampsia remain incompletely understood and debated.
What are the differences in echocardiographic systolic parameters between preeclamptic and normotensive pregnant women?
Case-Control (n=200)
No
What are the differences in echocardiographic systolic parameters between preeclamptic and normotensive pregnant women?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prospective study reveals significant maternal systolic dysfunction in preeclampsia, suggesting blood pressure monitoring alone cannot adequately detect cardiovascular complications.
Introduction: Preeclampsia is a disease unique to pregnancy and it is characterized by progressive hypertension, pathological edema and proteinuria.But till now the hemodynamics of preeclampsia is not properly understood and is debated.Study aimed to assess maternal cardiovascular function using echocardiography in normal and preeclamptic women.Material and Methods: Our study was a prospective study on 200 women admitted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Chalmeda Anand Rao Institute of Medical Sciences, Bommakal, Karimnagar, Telangana state, India.All women underwent two-dimensional echocardiography at rest.Cardiac systolic parameters were recorded and studied.Results: The studied parameters like Mean Left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), Mean stroke volume, Mean aortic root diameter and Mean total vascular resistance were higher in the Pregnancy Induced Hypertension (PIH) group than the controls and the difference was statistically significant.The Mean left ventricular outflow tract diameter in the Pregnancy Induced Hypertension (PIH) group was also higher than the control group, with the difference being insignificant.Conclusion: Women with preeclampsia have significant systolic dysfunction compared to normotensive controls.Blood pressure monitoring alone is insufficient to identify effectively, risk of cardiovascular complications in these subjects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Neha et al. (2019) conducted a case-control in Preeclampsia (n=200). Preeclampsia (Pregnancy Induced Hypertension) vs. Normotensive healthy pregnancy was evaluated on Mean left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV, mL) (p=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: