Why the study?
Does isoproterenol infusion produce comparable hemodynamic effects to supine submaximal exercise in children with pulmonary valvar stenosis?
Does isoproterenol infusion produce comparable hemodynamic effects to supine submaximal exercise in children with pulmonary valvar stenosis?
Isoproterenol infusion does not accurately simulate the hemodynamic effects of exercise in children with pulmonary valvar stenosis.
Isoproterenol underestimates pulmonary valve area versus exercise at matched heart rates in children; leaves open whether exercise-specific norms are needed for accurate stenosis grading.
In children with congenital cardiac anomalies, isoproterenol has been used to simulate exercise. To determine if these states are comparable, 28 children with pulmonary valvar stenosis were studied by cardiac catheterization at rest, during supine submaximal exercise, and during isoproterenol infusion. Similar heart rates were obtained during exercise (142/min) and isoproterenol infusion (139/min). Cardiac index, right ventricular systolic pressure and oxygen consumption were measured during each physiologic state. The change in pulmonary valve area from rest was calculated. At similar heart rates, cardiac index was significantly greater with exercise than with isoproterenol and right ventricular systolic pressure was similar in the two states. Thus, the calculated pulmonary valve area was significantly smaller with the pharmacologically induced stress. The study indicates that several of the hemodynamic effects of isoproterenol are not comparable to those produced by exercise in patients with pulmonary valvar stenosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Neal et al. (1974) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: