Why the study?
Does a new rate-adjusted ECG trigger method improve interscan reproducibility of coronary artery calcium scoring compared to the 80% R-R interval trigger method in asymptomatic subjects with CAC?
Does a new rate-adjusted ECG trigger method improve interscan reproducibility of coronary artery calcium scoring compared to the 80% R-R interval trigger method in asymptomatic subjects with CAC?
A new rate-adjusted ECG trigger method significantly improves the interscan reproducibility of coronary artery calcium scoring by electron beam tomography compared to the standard 80% R-R interval method.
Supports adoption of rate-adjusted ECG triggering for CAC scoring; extends RCT evidence for improved interscan reproducibility in asymptomatic subjects.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To improve the interscan reproducibility with electron beam tomography (EBT) by choosing an optimal electrocardiographic (ECG) trigger time. METHODS: Two hundred fourteen asymptomatic subjects found to have coronary artery calcium (CAC) on EBT were rescanned immediately to measure the interscan variability. Subjects were randomized to one of two different ECG trigger interval groups: the new trigger method (group 1) and the 80% R-R interval trigger method (group 2). The new trigger method was derived from a previous study of motion in the coronary arteries. In group 1 (new trigger method), the ECG trigger was programmed for a certain time (in ms) after the R wave, based on the resting heart rate. The triggers for group 1 were 360 (heart rate <50 beats per minute [bpm]), 340 (51--60 bpm), 314 (61--70 bpm), 300 (71--80 bpm), 290 (81--90 bpm), 280 (91--100 bpm), and 270 ms (>100 bpm). The interscan variation (CAC area and Agatston score) was compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The interscan variability was significantly reduced using the new trigger method for both CAC area and score compared with the 80% trigger method. The individual lesion variation was also significantly reduced by the new trigger method compared with the 80% trigger method. Area measure had a significantly lower variability compared with the Agatston score. CONCLUSIONS: These results strongly support the use of this new ECG trigger that relies on a rate-adjusted millisecond delay after the R wave instead of the more commonly used 80% R-R interval in EBT calcium studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mao et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: