Why the study?
High intensity aerobic interval training is an alternative to moderate-intensity continuous training for chronic heart failure, but whether a modified group-based protocol is superior remained to be highlighted.
Does modified group-based high intensity aerobic interval training (m-Ullevaal) improve functional capacity and quality of life compared to moderate-intensity continuous training in patients with stable chronic heart failure?
Comparison
Modified group-based HIAIT (m-Ullevaal) vs MICT
Design
Single-blind, prospective randomized controlled trial
Follow-up
12 weeks
Authors
Loading...
May support m-Ullevaal in CHF programs; leaves open superiority over MICT in larger randomized trials.
Does modified group-based high intensity aerobic interval training (m-Ullevaal) improve functional capacity and quality of life compared to moderate-intensity continuous training in patients with stable chronic heart failure?
Modified group-based high-intensity aerobic interval training (m-Ullevaal) is more effective than moderate-intensity continuous training for improving functional capacity and quality of life in patients with stable chronic heart failure.
Papathanasiou et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: