Why the study?
Heart valve replacement with mechanical or biological prostheses entails risk of thromboembolism and bleeding complications, prompting an evaluation of complications related to anticoagulation therapy and the probability of risk.
What is the rate of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications in patients with prosthetic heart valves receiving vitamin K antagonists?
What is the rate of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications in patients with prosthetic heart valves receiving vitamin K antagonists?
Patients with mechanical heart valves receiving vitamin K antagonists have a high rate of bleeding and thromboembolic complications, which are strongly associated with non-optimal INR control.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Complications linked to non-optimal INR call for vigilant management; leaves open optimal strategies for future trials.
BACKGROUND: Heart valve replacement surgery with mechanical or biological prostheses entails a risk of thromboembolism and bleeding complications. OBJECTIVE: To determine the complications related to complementary anticoagulation therapy and the probability of risk. METHODS: One-hundred and sixty-three patients who underwent heart valve replacement between 2002 and 2016 with either mechanical or biological prostheses, and who received vitamin K antagonists after hospital discharge, were studied. Anticoagulation therapy was categorized into optimal and non-optimal according to INR values prior to the development of complications. Patients with comorbidities and other risk factors for thrombosis and/or bleeding were excluded. RESULTS: In total, 68.7 % of patients received mechanical prostheses, and 31.3 %, biological prostheses (p ≤ 0.001); 25.2 % experienced the complications that motivated the study (p ≤ 0.001), which were hemorrhagic in 48.8 %, thromboembolic in 26.8 %, and of both types in 24.4 % (relative risk = 4.229). Among the patients with complications, 95.1 % received mechanical prostheses, and 4.9 %, biological (p = 0.005); non-optimal INR was identified in 49.7 % (p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Given the high risk of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications, valve prostheses must be carefully chosen, and care priorities should include prevention and follow-up, especially in those patients who require anticoagulation therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sánchez-Medina et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: