Why the study?
Does an abrupt increase in LV preload alter electromechanical activation time (EMAT) and LV dP/dt in patients undergoing LV angiography?
Does an abrupt increase in LV preload alter electromechanical activation time (EMAT) and LV dP/dt in patients undergoing LV angiography?
Electromechanical activation time (EMAT) is a responsive, non-invasive parameter that can rapidly detect changes in left ventricular contractility induced by preload alterations.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Baseline dP/dt may determine EMAT and contractility response to preload; leaves open EMAT utility for non-invasive monitoring pending prospective validation.
AIM/OBJECTIVES: Previous work has shown that the electromechanical activation time (EMAT) is prolonged in patients with abnormally low left ventricular (LV) dP/dt. In the present study, we investigated whether EMAT was responsive to rapid changes in LV systolic function induced by abrupt increases in LV preload. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 116 patients were assessed before and after LV angiography with a bolus injection of 40 mL of non-ionic contrast dye. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) increased from 18 ± 7 mmHg to 20 ± 8 mmHg (P < 0.01). In patients with a baseline dP/dt < 1500 mmHg/sec, dP/dt increased from 1098 ± 213 mmHg/sec to 1146 ±306 mmHg/sec (P=0.02) and EMAT decreased from 106 ± 29 ms to 103 ±18 ms (P=0.02). In patients with a baseline dP/dt > 1500 mmHg/sec, dP/dt decreased from 1894 ± 368 mmHg/sec to 1762 ± 403 mmHg/sec (P=0.01) and EMAT increased from 88 ± 13 ms to 93 ± 16 ms (P=0.02). Changes in negative dP/dt were similar to changes in dP/dt. CONCLUSION: Electromechanical activation time is a non-invasively measured parameter that allows accurate and rapid detection of changes in LV contractility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jamshidi et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: