Why the study?
Elevations of fasting glucose levels frequently occur with thiazide diuretics, with lower risk seen with ACE inhibitors, but whether genetic factors play a role was unknown.
Does a diabetes gene risk score predict fasting glucose elevation in nondiabetic hypertensive individuals treated with different antihypertensive medications?
Does a diabetes gene risk score predict fasting glucose elevation in nondiabetic hypertensive individuals treated with different antihypertensive medications?
A diabetes gene risk score may predict fasting glucose elevation in nondiabetic hypertensive patients treated with amlodipine, but not with lisinopril or chlorthalidone.
May prompt genetic screening before amlodipine in high-risk patients; extends pharmacogenomic interaction evidence in hypertension.
BACKGROUND: Elevations of fasting glucose (FG) levels are frequently encountered in people treated with thiazide diuretics. The risk is lower in people treated with ACE inhibitors (ACEi). To determine if genetic factors play a role in FG elevation, we examined the interaction of a diabetes gene risk score (GRS) with the use of 3 different antihypertensive medications. METHODS: We examined 376 nondiabetic hypertensive individuals with baseline FG <100 mg/dl who were genotyped for 24 genes associated with risk of elevated glucose levels. All participants had ≥1 follow-up FG level over 6 years of follow-up. Participants were randomized to treatment with a thiazide-like diuretic (chlorthalidone), a calcium channel blocker (CCB; amlodipine), or an ACEi (lisinopril). Outcomes were an FG increase of ≥13 or ≥27 mg/dl, the upper 75% and 90% FG increase in the parent cohort from which the present cohort was obtained. Odds ratios were adjusted for factors that increase FG levels. RESULTS: For every 1 allele increase in GRS, the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were 1.06 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.99, 1.14; P = 0.06) and 1.09 (95% CI: 0.99, 1.20; P = 0.08). When results were examined by randomized medications, participants randomized to amlodipine had statistically significant odds for either outcome (OR: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.48; P = 0.01 and OR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.62; P = 0.01). No such risk increase was found in participants randomized to the other 2 medications. CONCLUSIONS: A diabetes GRS predicts FG elevation in people treated with a CCB, but not with an ACEi or diuretic. These findings require confirmation. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: Trial number NCT00000542.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barzilay et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: