Why the study?
Does a uremic state alter the content of cardiac troponin T and CK-MB in the skeletal muscle of rats?
Does a uremic state alter the content of cardiac troponin T and CK-MB in the skeletal muscle of rats?
Uremia does not increase the expression of cardiac troponin T or CK-MB in rat skeletal muscle, suggesting that clinical elevations in these biomarkers in uremic patients may not originate from skeletal muscle.
No support for skeletal muscle as troponin source in experimental uremia; leaves open mechanisms of elevations seen clinically in CKD.
BACKGROUND: The assertion that creatine kinase MB (CK-MB) and the developmental isoforms of cardiac troponin T (cTnT) are expressed by skeletal muscle in some clinical settings is an extrapolation from nonuremic rodent studies. We studied the content of CK-MB and cTnT in skeletal muscle of the renal-insufficient rat. METHODS: Skeletal muscles (gastrocnemius) were collected from both five-sixths nephrectomized rats (n = 11) and sham-operated controls (n = 11). cTnT content was analyzed by Elecsys (Roche), immunoblotting, and immunohistochemistry with antibodies M7 and M11-7 (Roche). CK isoenzymes were analyzed electrophoretically. RESULTS: Trace concentrations of cTnT were detected in some of the skeletal muscle samples [controls (3 of 11) and uremic rats (1 of 11)] at concentrations <0.01% of that detected in heart. By contrast, positive staining appeared in both groups with M11-7 by immunoblotting and immunohistochemistry. No immunoreactivity was detected in skeletal muscle using M7 in the immunoblot format, although immunoreactivity was detected by immunohistochemistry in all samples. The median percentages of CK-MB were 6.0% and 4.1% for the skeletal muscle from control and uremic rats, respectively. CONCLUSION: The detection of cTnT and CK-MB in skeletal muscle does not differ for uremic rats compared with sham-operated controls. cTnT isoforms detected by qualitative methods are not detected with the cTnT immunoassay. Observations with rodents should not necessarily be extrapolated to humans.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fredericks et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: