Why the study?
The study was conducted to assess the potential benefits of an additional unenhanced acquisition in CTA in patients with suspected acute aortic syndrome.
Does an additional unenhanced acquisition in CTA improve the detection of intramural hematoma in patients with suspected acute aortic syndrome?
Does an additional unenhanced acquisition in CTA improve the detection of intramural hematoma in patients with suspected acute aortic syndrome?
Adding an unenhanced acquisition to aortic CTA protocols facilitates the detection of intramural hematoma in patients with suspected acute aortic syndrome.
May support unenhanced phase in aortic CTA for suspected IMH; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
AIM: To assess potential benefits of an additional unenhanced acquisition in computed tomography angiography (CTA) in patients with suspected acute aortic syndrome (AAS). METHODS: A total of 103 aortic CTA (non-electrocardiography-gated, 128 slices) performed due to suspected AAS were retrospectively evaluated for acute aortic dissection (AAD), intramural hematoma (IMH), or penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU). Spiral CTA protocol consisted of an unenhanced acquisition and an arterial phase. If AAS was detected, a venous phase (delay, 90 s) was added. Images were evaluated for the presence and extent of AAD, IMH, PAU, and related complications. The diagnostic benefit of the unenhanced acquisition was evaluated concerning detection of IMH. RESULTS: = 0.135). CONCLUSION: IMH is a common and difficult to detect entity of AAS. An additional unenhanced acquisition within an aortic CTA protocol facilitates the detection of IMH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Panagiotopoulos et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: