Why the study?
There is a paucity of guidelines and randomized trials to guide clinical practice for superior vena cava syndrome.
This review highlights percutaneous endovascular treatments as a first-line option for emergent and benign cases of superior vena cava syndrome.
Endovascular stenting may relieve SVCS symptoms; leaves open optimal technique and device selection for prospective study.
Superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) is a spectrum of symptoms resulting from the obstruction of the easily compressible SVC, due to either external compression from the mediastinal structures or internal narrowing of the vessel. SVCS was first described in 1757 by famed anatomist Sir William Hunter.[ 1 ] Malignant causes are the main etiology of SVCS, ranging from 70 to 85% of cases, predominantly due to lung cancer.[ 2 ] [ 3 ] Historically, infectious conditions such as granulomatous mediastinitis secondary to tuberculosis and syphilitic aortic aneurysm were the predominant causes; however, this has shifted due to antibiotic treatment and increased utility of central venous catheters and endovascular cardiac leads.[ 4 ] There is a paucity of guidelines and randomized trials to guide the clinical practice, and SVCS is treated on an individual basis, taking into account the etiology, severity of symptoms, and disease prognosis.[ 5 ] Endovascular therapy is considered the first-line treatment for the emergent and benign cases of SVCS, and can be a well-tolerated treatment for long-term symptomatic relief, in conjunction with other therapies. Publication History Article published online: 17 November 2022 © 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Trivedi et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: