Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reveals election deposit refunds increase re-contesting odds in local elections, suggesting lowered barriers for candidates.
Prior research on election deposit refunds has often focused on national-level elections or used broad candidate classifications. This paper provides new evidence from the local level in Taiwan’s single non-transferable vote council elections, where party institutionalization is high. Using a regression discontinuity design, the paper finds that receiving a refund increases the probability of re-contesting by 4 percentage points. Although the main effect is not robust across specifications, we further examine heterogeneity across candidates’ gender and party affiliation. The results indicate that the positive and significant effect of refunds on re-contesting is concentrated among independent candidates. These findings suggest that election deposit refunds help mitigate disparities in party resources, thereby lowering barriers to re-entry into electoral competition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2026 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: