Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Modular framework reveals how mobility restrictions impact cross-border inventor relationships and innovation in MNEs.
Cross-border inventor relationships are central to multinational enterprise (MNE) innovation, but they can be disrupted by policy shocks that limit mobility. This study uses a modular microfoundations framework to separate three links that are often bundled together: how macro-level mobility restrictions affect inventor relationships, how pre-existing relational and knowledge conditions shape resilience, and how inventor networks aggregate into firm-level innovation internationalisation. We combine inventor-level patent records from USPTO PatentsView and OECD REGPAT with policy measures from the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker and firm data for 120 global R&D-intensive MNEs from 2018 to 2022. Dyad-level estimates indicate that stricter travel restrictions and broader policy stringency were associated with lower rates of new cross-border tie formation and continuation. Existing relationships with repeated prior collaboration or greater technological overlap were less sensitive to these frictions. At the firm level, denser cross-border inventor networks were associated with broader international participation in inventive activity in the following period. The contribution is not a new general theory of internationalisation. Rather, the modular approach provides a level-specific explanation of where mobility shocks enter the innovation process, which relationships absorb them, and how micro-level disruption appears in firm-level outcomes. The findings also clarify the limits of patent-based collaboration measures and the role of organisational adaptation and digital coordination as boundary conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeremy Bennett (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: