Key result
Spouses of individuals with hypertension had 41% increased odds of having hypertension themselves.
Why the study?
Does having a spouse with hypertension increase the odds of having hypertension in individuals?
Meta-Analysis (n=81,928)
Does having a spouse with hypertension increase the odds of having hypertension in individuals?
There is significant spousal concordance for hypertension, highlighting the importance of shared environmental factors in its development.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports couple-based screening and lifestyle interventions; extends our understanding of shared environmental risks in hypertension.
The authors performed a meta-analysis of observational studies to estimate the magnitude of spousal concordance for hypertension and to examine whether the concordance varied by important study methodological aspects. PubMed and Embase were searched up to June 2017 for cross-sectional, case-control, and cohort studies that investigated the concordance/association of hypertension between spouse pairs. A meta-analysis with random-effects models was performed by pooling adjusted odds ratios. Eight studies with a total number of 81 928 spouse pairs were eligible. The pooled results showed that spouses of individuals with hypertension had 41% (odds ratio, 1.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-1.64) increased odds of having hypertension themselves. The association applied to both men and women, and was not significantly different between studies with adjustment for body mass index and those without. The findings highlighted the importance of environmental factors in the development of hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2017) conducted a meta-analysis in Hypertension (n=81,928). Spousal hypertension vs. Spouses without hypertension was evaluated on Hypertension (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.21-1.64). Spouses of individuals with hypertension had 41% increased odds of having hypertension themselves.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: