Key result
Brachial flow-mediated dilation response was not associated with the risk of incident atrial fibrillation in older adults (4th vs 1st quartile HR 1.01; 95% CI 0.81-1.26).
Why the study?
Endothelial dysfunction is implicated in AF pathophysiology and shares common risk factors, but the prospective association of brachial flow-mediated dilation with incident AF in older adults required determination.
Is brachial flow-mediated dilation associated with the risk of incident atrial fibrillation in older adults?
Cohort (n=2,027)
Is brachial flow-mediated dilation associated with the risk of incident atrial fibrillation in older adults?
Hazard Ratio: 1.01 (95% CI 0.81–1.26)
Brachial flow-mediated dilation is not associated with the risk of developing incident atrial fibrillation in older adults, suggesting minimal utility as a risk marker in this population.
FMD should not inform AF risk assessment in older adults; leaves open endothelial dysfunction as a potential AF contributor.
BACKGROUND: Endothelial dysfunction is associated with common risk factors for AF and has been implicated in the pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation (AF) through a variety of mechanisms. We determined the prospective association of brachial flow-mediated dilation (FMD) with incident AF among older adults. METHODS: We included 2027 Cardiovascular Health Study participants (mean age=78.3 years, male=39%, Black=17%) who underwent brachial FMD measurement at the 1997 to 1998 clinic visit. Incident AF was ascertained by study electrocardiograms, hospital discharge diagnosis coding and Medicare claims data. Cox regression models were used to examine the association between FMD and incident AF. RESULTS: We identified 754 incident of AF cases (37%) over a median follow-up of 11.0 years. After adjusting for age, sex, race, height, weight, cardiovascular disease, cigarette smoking, hypertension, diabetes, kidney function, c-reactive protein, physical activity, alcohol consumption, and statins, the risk of AF did not differ according to brachial FMD response (4th vs 1st quartile hazard ratio (HR)=1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.81, 1.26; per FMD unit increment HR=1.01, 95% CI: 0.97, 1.05). CONCLUSION: We found no relationship between brachial FMD and the risk of developing AF in this elderly cohort. Our findings suggest that the utility of brachial FMD as a risk marker for AF in older individuals is minimal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Garg et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=2,027). Brachial flow-mediated dilation (FMD) vs. 1st quartile FMD was evaluated on Incident atrial fibrillation (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.81, 1.26). Brachial flow-mediated dilation response was not associated with the risk of incident atrial fibrillation in older adults (4th vs 1st quartile HR 1.01; 95% CI 0.81-1.26).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: