Key result
Baseline characteristics of 375 pediatric patients randomized to sacubitril/valsartan or enalapril showed 85% had NYHA/Ross class I/II heart failure and 70% had a prior HF hospitalization.
Why the study?
Sacubitril/valsartan is approved for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in adults, but its effects in pediatric patients with heart failure required investigation.
Does sacubitril/valsartan improve clinical outcomes compared to enalapril in pediatric patients with heart failure due to systemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction?
RCT (n=375)
randomized
Yes
Does sacubitril/valsartan improve clinical outcomes compared to enalapril in pediatric patients with heart failure due to systemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction?
The PANORAMA-HF trial successfully recruited a homogeneous pediatric HF population with predominantly mild symptoms to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril.
Sacubitril/valsartan not superior to enalapril in pediatric HF; leaves open optimal ARNI use and requires dedicated pediatric outcome trials.
BACKGROUND: Sacubitril/valsartan has been approved for the management of heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction in adults. PANORAMA-HF trial (Prospective Trial to Assess the Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Neprilysin Inhibitor LCZ696 Versus Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor for the Medical Treatment of Pediatric HF) investigated its effects on clinical outcomes in pediatric patients with HF. METHODS: PANORAMA-HF is a multicenter, Phase II/III study using an adaptive, seamless, 2-part design. The study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of single doses of sacubitril/valsartan (Part 1), and the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril administered twice daily for 52 weeks (Part 2) in pediatric patients with HF due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction with biventricular heart physiology. An innovative trial design using a novel global rank assessment of severity was employed. For analysis, eligible patients were stratified into 3 age groups (Group 1, 6 to <18 years; Group 2a, 2 to <6 years; and Group 3a, 1 month to <2 years) and functional classification (New York Heart Association/Ross class I/II and III/IV). RESULTS: We report the key demographic, baseline, and clinical characteristics of 375 pediatric patients randomized to receive the study medication. The mean age for patients in Groups 1, 2a, and 3a was 12.2, 3.2, and 1.3 years, respectively. About 70% of patients had a prior HF hospitalization, 85% had New York Heart Association/Ross class I/II HF, and ≈8% were angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker naïve. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to other pediatric HF studies, PANORAMA-HF recruited a relatively homogeneous pediatric HF population across 3 age groups, enabling a more robust evaluation of pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and efficacy/safety of sacubitril/valsartan. Most patients had mildly symptomatic HF at baseline. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT02678312.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shaddy et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Heart failure due to systemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (n=375). Sacubitril/valsartan vs. Enalapril was evaluated on Global rank assessment of severity (efficacy and safety). Baseline characteristics of 375 pediatric patients randomized to sacubitril/valsartan or enalapril showed 85% had NYHA/Ross class I/II heart failure and 70% had a prior HF hospitalization.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: