Key result
Landiolol treatment resulted in 77.8% of patients being free from recurrent hemodynamically unstable ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation.
Why the study?
The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of landiolol in Japanese patients with recurrent hemodynamically unstable VT or VF refractory to class III antiarrhythmic drugs.
Does landiolol prevent recurrent VT/VF in Japanese patients with recurrent hemodynamically unstable VT/VF refractory to class III antiarrhythmic drugs?
Does landiolol prevent recurrent VT/VF in Japanese patients with recurrent hemodynamically unstable VT/VF refractory to class III antiarrhythmic drugs?
In patients with hemodynamically unstable VT/VF refractory to class III antiarrhythmic drugs, the ultra-short-acting β1-blocker landiolol successfully prevented arrhythmia recurrence in 77.8% of cases.
May support landiolol in refractory VT/VF; observational data leave efficacy unconfirmed pending RCTs.
BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of landiolol in Japanese patients with recurrent hemodynamically unstable ventricular tachycardia or recurrent ventricular fibrillation (recurrent VT/VF). METHODS AND RESULTS: This was an open-label, uncontrolled, multicenter study. Patients with hemodynamically unstable VT or VF 24 h prior to providing informed consent, and who were refractory to class III antiarrhythmic drugs, were enrolled. Landiolol was started at a dose of 1 μg/kg/min, after VT/VF was suppressed with electrical defibrillation. Landiolol was titrated up to 10 μg/kg/min in 1 h and adjusted between 1 and 40 μg/kg/min for the efficacy assessment (1-49 h). The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients free from recurrent VT/VF. Secondary efficacy endpoints included the number of recurrent VT/VF events and the survival rate 30 days after the start of landiolol treatment. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed for safety; 27 and 29 patients were analyzed for efficacy and safety, respectively. The proportion of patients free from recurrent VT/VF was 77.8% (95% CI 57.1-89.3). The mean (±standard deviation) number of recurrent VT/VF events was 9.3±7.9. The survival rate was 96.3%. The overall incidence of AEs and of serious AEs was 72.4% and 6.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Landiolol may be useful for Japanese patients with recurrent VT/VF who do not respond to class III antiarrhythmic drugs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ikeda et al. (2019) studied Recurrent hemodynamically unstable ventricular tachycardia or recurrent ventricular fibrillation (n=29). Landiolol was evaluated on Proportion of patients free from recurrent hemodynamically unstable VT or recurrent VF during the efficacy assessment period (95% CI 57.1-89.3). Landiolol treatment resulted in 77.8% of patients being free from recurrent hemodynamically unstable ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: