Why the study?
Following the recent development of the Non-adherence Academic Research Consortium (NARC) standardized classification, the prevalence and clinical impact of NARC-defined self-reported P2Y12 inhibitor non-adherence after PCI remained to be determined.
Does non-adherence to P2Y12 inhibitors increase the risk of adverse clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Does non-adherence to P2Y12 inhibitors increase the risk of adverse clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
In a real-world PCI population, non-adherence to P2Y12 inhibitors occurred in 17% of patients and was independently associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events.
Non-adherence to P2Y12 inhibitors associated with higher POCE risk after PCI; leaves open whether adherence interventions improve outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ueki et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: