Why the study?
Does a Japanese standard loading dose of prasugrel (20 mg) improve platelet inhibition compared to clopidogrel (300 mg) in Japanese patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI?
Does a Japanese standard loading dose of prasugrel (20 mg) improve platelet inhibition compared to clopidogrel (300 mg) in Japanese patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI?
Prasugrel may provide faster platelet inhibition than clopidogrel in Japanese STEMI; leaves open impact on clinical outcomes after primary PCI.
BACKGROUND: Few studies have compared the platelet reactivity of prasugrel and clopidogrel in the acute phase of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed in 78 patients with STEMI within 12 h of onset. Patients were randomly assigned to receive a Japanese standard loading dose of prasugrel 20 mg or clopidogrel 300 mg. Platelet reactivity was serially assessed using the VerifyNow-P2Y12 assay, the results of which were expressed as P2Y12-reaction-units (PRU). PRU values were significantly lower in the prasugrel group (n=38) than in the clopidogrel group (n=40) at 3 h, 24 h, and 14 days after loading (191±101 vs. 271±50, 147±80 vs. 261±57, and 171±67 vs. 221±70, respectively, P<0.05), although the PRU levels at baseline (231±57 vs. 237±58, P=0.65) and 1 h after loading (282±65 vs. 291±62, P=0.54) were similar. As compared with the baseline values, the PRU levels at 1, 3 and 24 h after clopidogrel loading were significantly higher (respectively, P<0.05), whereas only the PRU at 1 h after prasugrel was elevated (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In Japanese patients with STEMI who undergo primary PCI, prasugrel provides stronger platelet inhibition than clopidogrel from 3 h after loading, whereas platelet reactivity remained elevated within 24 h after clopidogrel loading. (Circ J 2016; 80: 2520-2527).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ichikawa et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: