Why the study?
Heart failure remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally, requiring updated, patient-centric recommendations based on contemporary evidence to prevent, diagnose, and manage patients.
Population
Patients with heart failure
Design
Clinical practice guideline
Loading...
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“We have four medications to save lives and improve outcomes more than ever, and that therapy is standard core therapy with four drug classes... that can be initiated and optimized as soon as possible: that should be clear. Every patient with reduced EF should have optimization of these four classes.”
“One primary goal with the new guideline was to use recently published data to update our recommendations for the evaluation and management of heart failure. One focus was prevention of heart failure through optimizing blood pressure control and adherence to a healthy lifestyle.”
“We have very important updates to the recommendations, including quadruple classes of medications indicated for patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction. These include SGLT2 inhibitors, along with beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor inhibitor antagonists (MRA), renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibition with angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers.”
Updates HF prevention, diagnosis, and management recommendations; extends 2013/2017 guidelines with evidence through 2020.
This executive summary outlines the updated 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA clinical practice guidelines for the prevention, diagnosis, and management of heart failure.
A 2022 study conducted a review in Heart failure. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure was evaluated. The 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline provides updated, evidence-based recommendations for clinicians to prevent, diagnose, and manage patients with heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: