Why the study?
Does exogenous or endogenous ANP modulate the acute pulmonary pressor response to hypoxia in conscious rats?
Does exogenous or endogenous ANP modulate the acute pulmonary pressor response to hypoxia in conscious rats?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Exogenous ANP blocks the acute pulmonary pressor response to hypoxia via cGMP accumulation, while endogenous ANP modulates the subacute phase of hypoxic pulmonary hypertension.
To test the hypothesis that exogenous atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) prevents the acute pulmonary pressor response to hypoxia, ANP (20-micrograms/kg bolus followed by 1-microgram.kg-1.min-1 infusion) or vehicle was administered intravenously to conscious rats beginning 3 min before exposure to hypoxia or room air for 90 min. Exogenous ANP abolished the acute pulmonary pressor response to hypoxia in association with marked and parallel increases in plasma ANP and guanosine 5'-cyclic monophosphate (cGMP) and with a significant increase in lung cGMP content. To examine whether endogenous ANP modulates the acute pulmonary pressor response to hypoxia, rats were pretreated with a monoclonal antibody (Ab) to ANP and exposed to hypoxia. Mean pulmonary arterial pressure (MPAP) in the Ab-treated rats was not different from control over the first 6 h of hypoxic exposure. Thereafter, the Ab-treated group had significantly higher MPAP than control. Our data suggest that 1) exogenous ANP blocks the pulmonary pressor response to acute hypoxia via stimulation of cGMP accumulation in the pulmonary vasculature, and 2) endogenous ANP may modulate the subacute, but not acute, phase of hypoxic pulmonary hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jin et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: