Why the study?
To assess the impact of maternal multivalent DTaP/IPV immunisation on the infant immune response to IPV.
Does maternal immunisation with DTaP/IPV reduce infant poliovirus-specific neutralising antibody response?
Does maternal immunisation with DTaP/IPV reduce infant poliovirus-specific neutralising antibody response?
Maternal DTaP/IPV immunisation during pregnancy may blunt the infant's immune response to IPV, potentially leaving them insufficiently protected against poliomyelitis until their pre-school booster.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Maternal DTaP/IPV blunts infant IPV seroconversion; supports IPV-free pertussis vaccines in pregnancy and confirms maternal antibody interference.
Multivalent diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis and inactivated poliovirus vaccine (DTaP/IPV) has been offered to pregnant women in the United Kingdom since 2012. To assess the impact of maternal DTaP/IPV immunisation on the infant immune response to IPV, we measured poliovirus-specific neutralising antibodies at 2, 5 and 13 months of age in a randomised, phase 4 study of Repevax or Boostrix/IPV in pregnancy and in a non-randomised group born to women not given DTaP/IPV in pregnancy. Infants whose mothers received DTaP/IPV were less likely to seroconvert after three IPV doses than those whose mothers did not receive DTaP/IPV. At 13 months of age, 63/110 (57.2 %), 46/108 (42.6 %) and 40/108 (37.0 %) were seropositive to types 1 to 3, compared with 20/22 (90.9 %), 20/22 (90.9 %) and 14/20 (70.0 %) (p-values 0.003, <0.001 and 0.012). UK infants whose mothers are given DTaP/IPV in pregnancy may be insufficiently protected against poliomyelitis until their pre-school booster.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grassly et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: