Why the study?
Does alacepril improve left ventricular hypertrophy and function in patients with essential hypertension?
Does alacepril improve left ventricular hypertrophy and function in patients with essential hypertension?
Long-term treatment with alacepril significantly reduces blood pressure and left ventricular mass index while improving systolic and diastolic function in patients with essential hypertension.
Hypothesis-generating for alacepril in hypertensive LVH; prospective trials needed before practice change.
The authors examined the effects of a long-term treatment with the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, alacepril, with respect to the reversal of left ventricular hypertrophy and the improvement of left ventricular function. Ten uncomplicated essential hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy, aged 53 +/- 8 years, were treated with alacepril alone for 12 months. All patients underwent echocardiography to to assess left ventricular dimensions and function before and after the treatment. After the treatment, blood pressure was decreased significantly from 163 +/- 14.1/98 +/- 4.2 to 142 +/- 20.3/86 +/- 11.0 mm Hg (each, P less than .01), whereas heart rate did not change (66 +/- 6 versus 69 +/- 8 beats/min). The left ventricular mass index was decreased significantly from 146 +/- 27 to 119 +/- 29 g/m2 (P less than .01). Ejection fraction, fractional shortening, peak shortening rate, and peak lengthening rate all improved significantly after the treatment. There was a significant inverse relationship between fractional shortening and end-systolic wall stress before the treatment (r = .63, P less than .05), and this relationship did not change after the treatment. It is concluded that alacepril improved both left ventricular systolic and diastolic function without causing any consistent augmentation of left ventricular contractility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sumimoto et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: