Why the study?
It was unclear whether TAVI without predilation (direct TAVI; d-TAVI) or with preimplantation balloon valvuloplasty (b-TAVI) provides similar clinical safety and efficacy.
Does direct TAVI without predilation improve clinical safety and efficacy compared to TAVI with preimplantation balloon valvuloplasty in patients with severe aortic stenosis?
Does direct TAVI without predilation improve clinical safety and efficacy compared to TAVI with preimplantation balloon valvuloplasty in patients with severe aortic stenosis?
Direct TAVI without predilation offers a better safety profile for balloon-expandable valves but is associated with higher paravalvular leakage in self-expanding valves, highlighting the need for careful patient and valve selection.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Currently, it is unclear whether transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) without predilation (direct TAVI; d-TAVI) or with preimplantation balloon valvuloplasty (b-TAVI) provides similar clinical safety and efficacy. Therefore, we analyzed patients undergoing d-TAVI or b-TAVI for severe aortic stenosis (AS) with either self-expanding or balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves (THVs) from the German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY). METHODS: Between 2011 and 2017, a total of 44,783 TAVI patients were collected, with 25,717 (57.4%) receiving a balloon-expandable THV and 19,066 (42.6%) receiving a self-expanding THV. A propensity-score weighted model was used to compare d-TAVI vs b-TAVI regarding differences in outcome. RESULTS: B-TAVI was performed in 71% and d-TAVI was performed in 29% of patients. In the investigated time interval, frequency of b-TAVI declined from 88.4% to 58.2%, accompanied by a constant rate of postdilation. After propensity weighting of patients receiving balloon-expandable THV, d-TAVI vs b-TAVI was associated with more frequent postoperative transvalvular mean pressure gradients (mPG) >15 mm Hg (20.7% vs 18.4%; P<.001), similar rates of paravalvular leakage (PVL) ≥ moderate (18.0% vs 16.9%; P=.08), fewer postdilations (13.4% vs 15.5%; P<.001), and fewer complications (permanent pacemaker implantation, 10.2% vs 11.9% [P=.01]; vascular complications, 1.9% vs 2.6% [P<.01]; pericardial tamponade, 0.5% vs 0.9% [P<.01]; and stroke, 0.9% vs 1.3% [P=.02]). In patients receiving self-expanding THVs, d-TAVI vs b-TAVI was associated with more frequent postimplantation mean PG ≥ 15 mm Hg (12.7% vs 10.4%; P<.01), higher rates of PVL ≥ moderate (24.8% vs 16.5%; P<.001), and similar complication rates including permanent pacemaker implantation. CONCLUSIONS: The safety and efficacy of d-TAVI vs b-TAVI depends on the type of THV implanted. For balloon-expandable valves, d-TAVI provides an advantage, while self-expanding valves offer a similar safety profile for d-TAVI compared with b-TAVI. However, increased mPG post intervention with both valve types and more significant PVL in self-expanding THVs emphasize the importance of proper patient selection and evaluation of valve anatomy to identify suitable cases for d-TAVI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alushi et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: