Key result
TAVI without BAV shows similar mortality compared to procedures with predilation.
Why the study?
Preimplantation balloon aortic valvuloplasty is routinely performed during TAVI, but it is unclear if omitting it affects clinical outcomes such as embolic events or hemodynamic instability.
Does TAVI without preimplantation BAV improve clinical outcomes compared to TAVI with preimplantation BAV in patients undergoing TAVI?
Comparison
TAVI without preimplantation BAV vs TAVI with preimplantation BAV
Design
Systematic review and meta-analysis
Follow-up
30-day
Authors
Loading...
Supports omitting routine predilation in TAVI; confirms comparable mortality across pooled studies.
Meta-Analysis (n=1,395)
Does TAVI without preimplantation BAV improve clinical outcomes compared to TAVI with preimplantation BAV in patients undergoing TAVI?
Relative Risk: 0.61 (95% CI 0.32–1.14)
p-value: p=0.12
TAVI without preimplantation balloon aortic valvuloplasty is associated with similar clinical outcomes and safety profile compared to TAVI with routine preimplantation BAV.
Bagur et al. (2016) conducted a meta-analysis in Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (n=1,395). TAVI without preimplantation BAV vs. TAVI with preimplantation BAV was evaluated on mortality (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.32-1.14, p=0.12). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation without preimplantation balloon aortic valvuloplasty resulted in similar mortality compared to procedures with predilation (RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.32-1.14; P=0.12).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: