Key result
Performing TAVI without pre-implantation balloon aortic valvuloplasty was not associated with adverse short-term outcomes compared to predilation in a propensity-matched analysis of 5,887 patients.
Why the study?
Aortic valve predilation with balloon aortic valvuloplasty before TAVI is recommended despite limited data on its necessity and potential embolization risks.
Does pre-implantation balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) improve short-term outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)?
Cohort (n=5,887)
Yes
Does pre-implantation balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) improve short-term outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Performing TAVI without pre-implantation balloon aortic valvuloplasty appears safe and is not associated with adverse short-term outcomes compared to routine predilation.
BACKGROUND: Aortic valve predilation with balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) is recommended before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), despite limited data around the requirement of this preprocedural step and the potential risks of embolization. This study aimed to investigate the trends in practice and associations of BAV on short-term outcomes in the UK TAVI registry. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eleven clinical endpoints were investigated, including 30-day mortality, myocardial infarction, aortic regurgitation, valve dysfunction, and composite early safety. All endpoints were defined as per the VARC-2 definitions. Odd ratios of each endpoint were estimated using logistic regression, with data analyzed in balloon- and self-expandable valve subgroups. Propensity scores were calculated using patient demographics and procedural variables, which were included in the models of each endpoint to adjust for measured confounding. Between 2007 and 2014, 5887 patients met the study inclusion criteria, 1421 (24.1%) of whom had no BAV before TAVI valve deployment. We observed heterogeneity in the use of BAV nationally, both temporally and by center experience; rates of BAV in pre-TAVI workup varied between 30% and 97% across TAVI centers. All endpoints were similar between treatment groups in SAPIEN (Edwards Lifesciences Inc., Irvine, CA) valve patients. After correction for multiple testing, none of the endpoints in CoreValve (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) patients were significantly different between patients with or without predilation. CONCLUSIONS: Performing TAVI without predilation was not associated with adverse short-term outcomes post procedure, especially when using a balloon-expandable prosthesis. Randomized trials including different valve types are required to provide conclusive evidence regarding the utility of predilation before-TAVI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martin et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) (n=5,887). Pre-implantation balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) vs. No BAV (TAVI without predilation) was evaluated on Short-term outcomes including 30-day mortality, myocardial infarction, aortic regurgitation, valve dysfunction, and composite early safety. Performing TAVI without pre-implantation balloon aortic valvuloplasty was not associated with adverse short-term outcomes compared to predilation in a propensity-matched analysis of 5,887 patients.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: