Why the study?
Does an anticoagulant aptamer-antidote pair targeting factor IXa reduce thrombin generation and inflammation and improve cardiac function compared to heparin and protamine in a porcine cardiopulmonary bypass model?
Does an anticoagulant aptamer-antidote pair targeting factor IXa reduce thrombin generation and inflammation and improve cardiac function compared to heparin and protamine in a porcine cardiopulmonary bypass model?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A novel aptamer-antidote pair targeting factor IXa demonstrates potential as a safer alternative to heparin and protamine for anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass in a preclinical model.
Heparin and protamine are the standard anticoagulant-antidote regimen used in almost every cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) procedure even though both are associated with an array of complications and toxicities. Here we demonstrate that an anticoagulant aptamer-antidote pair targeting factor IXa can replace heparin and protamine in a porcine CPB model and also limit the adverse effects on thrombin generation, inflammation, and cardiac physiology associated with heparin and protamine use. These results demonstrate that targeting clotting factors upstream of thrombin in the coagulation cascade can potentially reduce the perioperative pathologies associated with CPB and suggest that the aptamer-antidote pair to FIXa may improve the outcome of patients undergoing CPB. In particular, this novel anticoagulant-antidote pair may prove to be useful in patients diagnosed with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia or those who have been sensitized to protamine, particularly patients who have insulin-dependent diabetes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nimjee et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: