Why the study?
Does an inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) booster reduce poliovirus shedding in stool in children previously immunized with oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV)?
Does an inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) booster reduce poliovirus shedding in stool in children previously immunized with oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV)?
An IPV booster dose provides elevated protection against poliovirus shedding for up to 11 months in children previously immunized with OPV.
Supports IPV booster to reduce shedding and transmission risk in OPV-primed children; confirms protection persisting to 11 months.
Background: In 2014, 2 studies showed that inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) boosts intestinal immunity in children previously immunized with oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV). As a result, IPV was introduced in mass campaigns to help achieve polio eradication. Methods: We conducted an open-label, randomized, controlled trial to assess the duration of the boost in intestinal immunity following a dose of IPV given to OPV-immunized children. Nine hundred healthy children in Vellore, India, aged 1-4 years were randomized (1:1:1) to receive IPV at 5 months (arm A), at enrollment (arm B), or no vaccine (arm C). The primary outcome was poliovirus shedding in stool 7 days after bivalent OPV challenge at 11 months. Results: For children in arms A, B, and C, 284 (94.7%), 297 (99.0%), and 296 (98.7%), respectively, were eligible for primary per-protocol analysis. Poliovirus shedding 7 days after challenge was less prevalent in arms A and B compared with C (24.6%, 25.6%, and 36.4%, respectively; risk ratio 0.68 [95% confidence interval: 0.53-0.87] for A versus C, and 0.70 [0.55-0.90] for B versus C). Conclusions: Protection against poliovirus remained elevated 6 and 11 months after an IPV boost, although at a lower level than reported at 1 month. Clinical Trials Registration: CTRI/2014/09/004979.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: