Why the study?
Do elevated baseline plasma 1-deoxysphingolipids predict incident type 2 diabetes mellitus in asymptomatic non-diabetic individuals?
Do elevated baseline plasma 1-deoxysphingolipids predict incident type 2 diabetes mellitus in asymptomatic non-diabetic individuals?
Elevated baseline plasma 1-deoxysphingolipids are strong, independent predictors of incident type 2 diabetes, particularly in non-obese individuals.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Identifies a novel biomarker for diabetes risk assessment; leaves open whether 1-deoxy.
1-Deoxysphingolipids (1-deoxySLs) are atypical sphingolipids, which are formed in a side reaction during sphingolipid de-novo synthesis. Recently, we demonstrated that 1-deoxySLs are biomarkers for the prediction of T2DM in obese, non-diabetic patients. Here we investigated the relevance of 1-deoxySLs as long-term predictive biomarkers for the incidence of T2DM in an asymptomatic population. Here, we analyzed the plasma sphingoid base profile in a nested group of non-diabetic individuals (N = 605) selected from a population-based study including 5 year follow-up data (CoLaus study). 1-DeoxySLs at baseline were significantly elevated in individuals who developed T2DM during the follow-up (p<0.001), together with increased glucose (p<5.11E-14), triglycerides (p<0.001) and HOMA-IR indices (p<0.001). 1-Deoxy-sphinganine (1-deoxySA) and 1-deoxy-sphingosine (1-deoxySO) were predictive for T2DM, even after adjusting for fasting glucose levels in the binary regression analyses. The predictive value of the combined markers 1-deoxySA+glucose were superior to glucose alone in normal-weight subjects (p<0.001) but decreased substantially with increasing BMI. Instead, plasma adiponectin and waist-to-hip ratio appeared to be better risk predictors for obese individuals (BMI>30kg/m2). In conclusion, elevated plasma 1-deoxySL levels are strong and independent risk predictors of future T2DM, especially for non-obese individuals in the general population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mwinyi et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: