Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hydrogen internal combustion engines offer a route to near-zero carbon on-road transport while preserving existing engine manufacturing and calibration know-how. Translating that potential into real-world driving, however, depends on transient control; steady-state maps alone cannot guarantee either safe operation or low NOx emissions during load steps. This paper reports a controlled transient sweep on a 0.4 L single-cylinder direct-injection spark-ignition hydrogen research engine. Five ramp durations (1.38, 1.08, 0.84, 0.48 and 0.24 s) were evaluated at a constant engine speed of 2,000 rpm with a target relative air–fuel ratio of 2.75 under closed-loop feedback control. The measurements track injection pulse width, spark timing, boost, lambda, IMEP, peak in-cylinder pressure and the maximum pressure rise rate ( R max ) through each transient. As ramp duration is shortened, lambda excursions and air-path overshoot grow rapidly: at 0.24 s the in-cylinder pressure overshoot approaches the mechanical safety limit, IMEP overshoots the steady-state target by about 22 %, and R max exceeds the 600 kPa/°CA calibrated threshold. With a ramp of 0.48 the most hazardous R max peak at roughly 1,000 kPa/°CA is caused, demonstrating that fastest is not always most damaging. Only the 1.38 s baseline keeps all combustion-severity metrics inside their reliability envelope. A feed-forward fuelling term scaled by the rate of manifold pressure change dP / d t is proposed to close the transient lambda gap; with physical implementation and experimental validation proposed as a future optimisation step. The results identify pressure-gradient management as the binding constraint for transient calibration of lean DI hydrogen engines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zaman et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: