Why the study?
Attenuating exercise-induced elevated left atrial pressure with an atrial shunt device was under clinical investigation for the treatment of symptomatic heart failure.
Does the Atrial Flow Regulator (AFR) device improve hemodynamics and clinical outcomes in symptomatic heart failure patients with elevated PCWP?
Does the Atrial Flow Regulator (AFR) device improve hemodynamics and clinical outcomes in symptomatic heart failure patients with elevated PCWP?
In a first-in-man study, the Atrial Flow Regulator device was feasible to implant, maintained patency up to 1 year, and significantly reduced resting pulmonary capillary wedge pressure in symptomatic heart failure patients.
Should not yet change practice; leaves open whether AFR shunting improves HF outcomes pending randomized trials.
AIMS: Attenuating exercise-induced elevated left atrial pressure with an atrial shunt device is under clinical investigation for treatment of symptomatic heart failure (HF). METHODS AND RESULTS: PRELIEVE was a prospective, non-randomised, multicentre, first-in-man study in symptomatic HF patients with reduced (HFrEF) or preserved (HFpEF) ejection fraction and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) ≥15 mmHg at rest or ≥25 mmHg during exercise. Here, we provide follow-up data up to 1 year after implantation of the Atrial Flow Regulator (AFR) device. The AFR was successfully implanted in 53 patients (HFrEF n = 24 and HFpEF n = 29). Two patients were not enrolled due to an unsuccessful transseptal puncture. There was one device embolisation into the left atrium, which required surgical removal. One patient experienced a serious procedure-related adverse event (post-procedural bleeding and syncope). All patients with sufficient echocardiography readout confirmed device patency with left-right shunt both at 3 (n = 47/51, 92%) and 12 (n = 45/49, 92%) months. At 3 months, rest PCWP decreased by 5 (-12, 0) mmHg (P = 0.0003, median Q1, Q3). No patient developed a stroke, worsening of right heart function or significant increase of pulmonary artery pressure. Six (6/53, 11%) patients were hospitalised for worsening of HF and three (3/53, 6%) patients died. We observed improvements in New York Heart Association functional class, 6-min walking distance and quality of life (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire) in certain patients. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of the AFR device in HF patients was feasible. No shunt occlusion, stroke or new right HF was observed during the 1-year follow-up, with clinical improvements in certain patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paitazoglou et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: