Why the study?
Does the superior vena cava play a significant arrhythmogenic role requiring empiric isolation during catheter ablation for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation?
Does the superior vena cava play a significant arrhythmogenic role requiring empiric isolation during catheter ablation for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation?
Empiric electrical isolation of the superior vena cava is likely unnecessary during catheter ablation for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation, as it is rarely an arrhythmogenic source.
Low SVC arrhythmogenicity supports avoiding empiric isolation in long-standing persistent AF ablation; leaves open efficacy of targeted strategies in randomized trials.
AIMS: The superior vena cava (SVC) has been established as an important source of atrial fibrillation (AF). The role of SVC in long-standing persistent AF and the efficacy of empiric electrical isolation of the SVC are still unclear. The purpose of this study was to judge the role of SVC in catheter ablation of long-standing persistent AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 102 consecutive patients with long-standing persistent AF were enrolled. All patients underwent circumferential pulmonary vein isolation, complex fractionated atrial electrograms ablation, and linear ablation during the index procedure. Superior vena cava-triggered AF and an SVC associated with the maintenance of AF were evaluated by mapping catheters during the procedure. The arrhythmogenicity of the SVC was confirmed in only 1 of the patients (0.98%). At the end of 12 months follow-up, the arrhythmia-free survival rate after a single procedure was 43.1%. After the last procedure (mean 1.47 ± 0.58 procedures), sinus rhythm was maintained in 71 (69.6%) patients, 63 of whom without antiarrhythmic drugs. The patients in AF recurrence group had higher rates of right atrium enlargement (71 vs. 34%, P = 0.03), ≥2 procedures (65 vs. 34%, P < 0.05), longer AF duration (84 ± 46 vs. 45 ± 34 months, P < 0.05), and larger left atrium diameter (50 ± 5 vs. 45 ± 6 mm, P < 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, left atrium diameter and AF duration were independent predictors of AF recurrence. CONCLUSION: The arrhythmogenic SVC is rarely detected in patients with long-standing persistent AF. Empiric SVC electrical isolation in the stepwise approach of long-standing persistent AF seems unnecessary.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: